It's important to remember that a rating is a measure of consistency so don't be put off playing higher rated players. Anybody under the rating of can play like an absolute idiot in a particular game and you'll find that you will sometimes play far beyond your own rating. The great thing about chess is that it's fun to play. Players rated and below probably have a lot more fun playing than professionals.
I think it was Gary Kasparov who said, "Chess is mental torture! It was a long and challenging game, but I did end up checkmating my opponent. After the game, I asked him what his rating was so I could write it on my scoresheet. He replied that he was rated !! I nearly collapsed as my knees started to knock — realizing that I had just defeated my first master! I knew that if I had known he was a master before the game, the likelihood is that I would have lost that game.
Please feel free to comment on this blog or email us at [email protected] if you have any additional chess rating questions! Happy tournament season! This leads to occasional "sand-bagging," losing points on purpose to lower your rating artificially in order to play in a weaker level tournament.
This is an offense that could get you kicked out of US Chess for life. On the other hand, telling strangers at tournaments that your rating is is a good way to earn their total respect for the entirety of the elevator ride- until your year-old daughter shows up and says "Daddy, how could you miss Ne5?!!
Q:My friend is too weak for me. I beat him every game. How do I find an opponent of my level? A: Internet gaming rooms are great ways to meet up with players of all levels. These both charge a fee for membership, but in return you get grandmaster analysis of top games around the world.
A popular free chessplayer server is yahoo. On all these servers, you earn ratings, ranging from about to Ideally, you want to find an opponent with a similar or slightly higher rating than your own. If you're yearning for some real-life chess action, check out if there is a club in your area through the US Chess chess club directory. Or, send out an email blast to your friends or post an ad on craigslist or myspace be sure to meet in a public place.
You'd be surprised how many potential chess partners there are in your circle. A lot of people love and learn the game early, but give it up since it's tough to find an appropriate opponent. In this way, chess is a lot like tennis. Less than one percent of rated players hold the title. Grandmaster abbreviated often to GM is the highest title you can achieve in chess. Q:How do I get better? A: If poker takes a minute to learn and a lifetime to master, chess takes a weekend to learn and several lifetimes to master!
But you can have fun, challenge yourself and improve at any level, and that's one of the greatest things about chess. Becoming a good player requires a firm grasp of tactics short-term operations to win material or deliver checkmate so you should check out our puzzle galleries or go to the US Chess Federation's online chess shop for tactics books for your level.
If you're looking to improve your strategical skills, there are a number of good books available on strategy, such as the classic My System or the more modern, Reassess Your Chess.
To get a feel for how strong players approach different positions, I recommend looking over annotated games from the Chess Life archives. Also, play, play, and play. If you combine concentrated play with study, you will improve! Q:I'm a single guy in college, and I heard chess is nerdy.
Why should I play? Playing consistently is key to improving. Sounds obvious but for me taking a year off set me back. I learned how to play chess at the age of 12,just the basics of chess. Trent: When learning openings, learn the ideas behind them and not so much on the actual moves. It will help you in memorizing the actual moves better because.
Start with the theories behind the moves first. The data in the op is pretty incorrect, in my opinion. A player with rating of is a pretty strong player compared to the casual chess player. In my high school, the weak chess players at the chess club rarely leave en prise pieces, and yet they are below for sure. The time span seems reasonable. Does someone need years to reach ?! But really important is the IMO, openings are NEVER an essential or even slightly important part of improvement: openings are rather useless to concrete chess improvement at all levels below , in my experience.
In my games against expert level opposition, I am constantly out of the opening by move 4 or 5. After the opening, someone had an advantage.
They lost it, and the evaluation shifted. Then that other player made a mistake, and finally it was a draw or something like this. If this happens at the expert level just about every time openings not mattering then I think only at a level points or so higher would it even start to matter and then only a bit. Everyone else should ignore it for the most part, I think.
I have had a good experience playing against these guys in the past, and I can say that most of them still make tactical blunders pretty easily when their position gets slightly worse, or I get an attack etc. At the expert level, this almost never happens anymore even class A it is pretty rare unless it is a serious positional advantage.
Their tactical skills are better, but only intermediate level. I consider my tactical skills to be at the intermediate level currently as well.
Also, I would generally cut out endgame study but not totally. Endgame study is interesting, since many players do it wrong and at the wrong time in their chess development, IMO. The first problem seems to be that players only care about the useless theoretical endgames that almost never occur in real life.
I have never had to play a lucena or philidor draw etc.. The only theoretical endgame knowledge I have are 2 key king and pawn endgame positions, and they have happened only once each. It is much more important to study strategy in endgames, and this I did a bit. Players at the skills levels of U rarely can play a competitive middlegame against good play.
Therefore, it is practical to gain good skills here and beat them in the middlegame and forget about the endgame. This is what I did. In the World Open U , only 1 game reached a competitive endgame, and that one was strategic.
I scored 7. I began to take chess seriously last year, right around my 24th birthday. I started playing games and ended with a low rating on chess. One thing that I noticed is that an organized study time and an organized life can lead to a better rating. I would agree with the explanations of how people play at different levels although I think people stop leaving pieces en prise far earlier than you suggest but the time range seems off. Im 15 years old and started playing chess 5 months ago, I have a chess coach and I practice around 2 hours everyday.
My rating is of around said by my coach, 3 times Brazilian champion. So I it is saying there that in years you can reach that rating of mine, not true. I started playing chess 3 years ago and now my rating is I have a chess coach every 4 weeks and I play on the computer no one at my house knew chess but my mom encourage me to play on the computer 2 games a day and do 15 minutes off endgame that help me a lot.
I have been playing chess by myself for 10 months and Im currently at in live blitz at chess. Is this considered fast? Not sure about some of that. I win games because my tactic awareness is better than my opponents, but in reality it is still pretty poor.
No training yet but play fast and love it. Any help on what to study. Who is a good coach in pensacola? I first learned how the pieces move when I was about 8, 10 years later I decided to really start learning the strategy, openings, tactics, etc.
Two weeks into learning I estimate from reading this article and based on my online rating I am at about the range. I signed up for the USCF and started going to club rated games.
Currently my rating is If your time is limited, I would focus on studying tactics. A good site for this is chesstempo. I would focus on tactics and in eliminating mistakes , before getting a coach. To the people with ratings over that are claiming a portion of their skills to not be any good… your being ridiculous. Good is relative, you may not have a chance against a grand master but you can still beat Defensive tactics are tactics that your opponent can play against you.
An offensive tactic are those tactics that you can play against your opponent. It depends what ratings do you mean? Do you mean rating at classical, fast or bullet chess?
Do you mean OTB rating or virtual one? There are a lot of factors that differentiate these data. If there are players rated — most often I can beat them, but not because of my genius — but rather simply due to their lack of patience, making simple unforced mistakes and sometimes playing very weak at endings. I made a test playing at FICS. I have been playing against one of my friends — he is about and I won 32 games, drew 2 games and lost just one.
Take notice there are some players who have been playing via Internet chess servers and in OTB play they can even reach online rating. That means they could have been able to outplay me without great effort.
0コメント